<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copiers Vs Printers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bostonkrownrecords.com/copiers-vs-printers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bostonkrownrecords.com/copiers-vs-printers/</link>
	<description>Technology and Computer News and Articles</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Walters</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonkrownrecords.com/copiers-vs-printers/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Walters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonkrownrecords.com/?p=624#comment-276</guid>
		<description>Great Points - I especially like "stored print jobs" to address the confidentiality issue.

In my studies, I have found that most output devices(over 1,200 copiers over the past 5 months) the average monthly volume is near 8,000k - well below most copiers recommended volume.  Even more interesting, when looking at MFP operational costs at these volume levels, the TOTAL operational cost is less then copiers - even when CPC is 0.007.

good job..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Points - I especially like &#8220;stored print jobs&#8221; to address the confidentiality issue.</p>
<p>In my studies, I have found that most output devices(over 1,200 copiers over the past 5 months) the average monthly volume is near 8,000k - well below most copiers recommended volume.  Even more interesting, when looking at MFP operational costs at these volume levels, the TOTAL operational cost is less then copiers - even when CPC is 0.007.</p>
<p>good job..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
